26
By Lars HamburgCo-founder and CEO, bigpredict.io
IIn a rapidly evolving financial industry, artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced analytics are driving profound transformation, providing banks with significant competitive advantages and numerous benefits. These technologies enable more personalized banking services, improve risk assessment and streamline operations, thereby improving profitability and customer satisfaction.
Predictive modeling, a key element of AI, uses complex patterns of data to inform decision-making. In banking, it enhances applications ranging from individualized mortgage pricing to credit risk assessments and algorithmic trading systems. These models help banks achieve higher portfolio margins, reduce churn, and increase transaction efficiency and profitability.
Optimization models play a crucial role in identifying the most effective solutions under various constraints, such as volumes, prices and risk factors. For example, with secured loans, they improve pricing strategies, thereby increasing portfolio margins. In wealth management, optimization contributes to customer profiling and product distribution, ensuring that services are tailored to individual customer needs.
Principles of psychology and decision-making are also applied in AI-based analytics to understand how individuals make financial choices, which helps design products that resonate with customers, thereby improving satisfaction and loyalty.
Additionally, tailored AI solutions and strategic AI implementations enable banks to meet specific business needs and remain competitive. These custom templates support functions such as selecting third-party managers in asset management, optimizing investment results, and improving hard money lending processes with faster loan processing and increased transaction volumes.
The success of these AI applications is evident across various banking sectors. For example, improved individualized pricing models for mortgages lead to better financial outcomes. Payment divisions benefit from AI-powered cross-selling strategies that increase retention rates. And commercial banks are seeing stronger B2B (business-to-business) relationships and increased reliance on loans through customized lending solutions.
Overall, the integration of AI and advanced analytics in banking not only refines customer service and operational efficiency, but also provides banks with a strategic advantage in a competitive market, heralding a new banking era that is more agile, innovative and customer-centric.
Despite the potential benefits of AI and advanced analytics, many banks struggle to implement these technologies effectively. To solve this problem, it is important to understand common pitfalls so that you can avoid them in future projects.
Large change projects are notoriously prone to failure, and most digital transformation projects fail. Investments in digital transformation projects are often wasted due to this high failure rate. Loss-making change projects are also the number one reason CEOs are fired.
As banks increasingly focus on AI-driven analytics, their massive projects often end in costly failures. These debacles are not only a complete waste of resources, but can also result in unjustified dismissals of competent professionals.
Digital transformations, like many organizational change projects, tend to fail for a variety of reasons that often intertwine. The most common causes include a lack of leadership, poor decision-making leading to overreach, insufficient focus, and a lack of precision in defining the specific business problems to be solved and precisely how to solve them. This often results in the inability to articulate a clear and compelling vision in change communications, coupled with a reasonable lack of organizational belief that proposed big solutions can produce transformative results.
These issues are further exacerbated as banks and other organizations invest in digital projects to become increasingly data-driven, leveraging artificial intelligence and advanced analytics.
There are three critical – and paradoxical – phenomena that lead to failure, either in isolation or in combination. In the following paragraphs, I will highlight these paradoxes to explain why many AI initiatives fail and propose a more pragmatic, data-driven approach to digital transformation in banking.
In the modern banking landscape, large investments in digital transformation projects are often driven by emotion, hype and fear of being left behind rather than justification, facts and data. Currently, much attention is paid to projects focused on AI-based analytics. Many banks embark on massive AI projects that promise to revolutionize their operations but end up failing at staggering costs.
These spectacular failures not only waste enormous amounts of resources, but also lead to unnecessary layoffs of competent professionals. The mistakes made are reminiscent of previous failures of technology investments in the financial sector, with doomed data lake projects as one example and premature and underperforming chatbot solutions as another.
It’s worth being wary of three common paradoxes related to investing in digital transformation projects in general and AI and analytics projects in particular.
The first is the decision paradox. Banks often announce a transition to a data-driven culture. However, their decision-making processes tell a different story. Time and again, I have seen banks invest in digital projects based on emotion, external pressure, psychological manipulation or executive intuition rather than on concrete empirical data. This paradox is not only ironic but also costly. Without basing their decisions on data, banks venture into projects poorly suited to their real needs, leading to the failure of initiatives that drain both time and financial resources.
Second, there is the size paradox. The appeal of large-scale digital projects is undeniable. Vendors and consultants often promote these grandiose projects, which promise transformative results and come with high consulting fees. However, the complexity and scale of these projects lead them to failure, and a large majority of them fail. In contrast, smaller, more targeted initiatives often lead to success. These projects are manageable and adaptable, allowing institutions to iterate and refine their approaches based on real-world feedback and evolving technology landscapes.
Third, there is the paradox of the solution. In many cases, banks invest heavily in broad, supposedly general-purpose solutions that then require significant customization to meet specific operational challenges, if they are ever truly fit for purpose. This retrospective approach of finding problems that fit predefined solutions leads to poor resource allocation. Banks should instead focus on identifying specific problems and then research or develop tailored solutions that directly address those needs, thereby improving efficiency and effectiveness.
Relationships between banks, on the one hand, and suppliers and consulting firms, on the other, are often fraught with conflicts of interest. Driven by the potential for lucrative contracts, consultants and suppliers may push for larger, more expensive projects that do not necessarily align with a bank’s strategic interests. This disconnect not only distorts the decision-making process, but also prioritizes the size of the project over the long-term success of the bank. Recognizing and mitigating these conflicts is crucial for banks who want to maintain control of their digital strategies and ensure they align with their core business objectives.
To successfully navigate these complexities, banks must take a pragmatic approach to digital transformation. This includes progressive, evidence-based decision-making and the development of internal capabilities. Instead of overhauling systems all at once, banks should take a step-by-step approach that allows them to test new technologies on a small scale, measure the results, and then scale up effective practices.
By creating machine learning (ML) solutions in-house to solve small, specific business problems, banks not only reduce their reliance on external vendors, but also develop a deeper understanding of their own business needs. data and systems integration. This local approach to upskilling, experimentation and building internal capacity helps manage risks and scale solutions so that digital transformation projects are closely aligned with the bank’s strategic objectives. Only after a bank has experimented, tested and found a series of data analytics solutions can it estimate the need and scope of an integrated solution, such as a data lake. Through these experiments, a surprising insight might emerge: You may not even need a data lake to start effectively leveraging AI and advanced analytics.
As we look to the future, the key to successful digital transformation lies in understanding and strategically managing its inherent paradoxes. By focusing on data-driven decisions, right-sized projects and tailored solutions, banks can avoid common pitfalls. Moreover, this careful and measured approach is essential not only to avoid failure, but also to foster long-term success and stability in an increasingly digital world.
Ultimately, the banking industry finds itself at a crossroads where the choice of path will determine its role in the digital age. Banks that wisely leverage AI and advanced analytics will not only survive, but thrive, turning potential disruptions into opportunities for innovation and growth. The path forward is not one of radical changes, but of thoughtful, incremental and strategic advancements that collectively enrich the banking experiences of all stakeholders involved.
